Author
Listed:
- Andri Sanityoso Sulaiman
- Pringgodigdo Nugroho
- Darlene Raudhatul Bahri
- Desti Rachmani
Abstract
Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains a significant global health concern, particularly among high-risk populations such as patients undergoing hemodialysis. Although nucleic acid testing (NAT) using RT-PCR remains the gold standard for HCV RNA detection, its centralized laboratory workflow limits accessibility. Point-of-care molecular testing (PoCT), such as the GeneXpert Fingerstick assay, offers a decentralized alternative for HCV RNA quantification. However, its analytical concordance with reference methods in Indonesian settings remains limited. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional analytical concordance study involving 57 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing hemodialysis at Cipto Mangunkusumo and Pelni Hospitals in Jakarta. Each participant underwent HCV RNA testing using three methods: GeneXpert HCV VL Fingerstick, GeneXpert HCV VL Plasma, and Cobas TaqMan RT-PCR (as the reference standard). Agreement among methods was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Cohen’s κ coefficient. Correlation for quantifiable values was evaluated using linear regression analysis. Results: Both GeneXpert methods showed perfect concordance with the Cobas TaqMan RT-PCR, with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV all at 100%. Agreement analysis yielded a Cohen’s κ of 1.000 (p 0.95). Conclusion: The GeneXpert HCV VL Fingerstick assay demonstrates excellent analytical agreement with conventional molecular testing and may serve as a simple, practical, decentralized alternative for monitoring HCV RNA in hemodialysis patients.
Suggested Citation
Andri Sanityoso Sulaiman & Pringgodigdo Nugroho & Darlene Raudhatul Bahri & Desti Rachmani, 2026.
"Diagnostic concordance of GeneXpert HCV VL fingerstick and GeneXpert HCV viral load with RT-PCR in POCT settings among hemodialysis patients,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-11, February.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0324671
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324671
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.