IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0324593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the impact of the National Health Insurance Fund oncology benefits package and a healthcare workers’ strike on time to cancer treatment initiation in Nairobi County, Kenya: An interrupted time series analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Robai Gakunga
  • Anne Korir
  • Janet Bouttell

Abstract

Introduction: In April 2015, Kenya introduced the National Health Insurance Oncology Benefits Package and its complementary reforms (oncology insurance scheme) to alleviate financial hardship among its members upon a cancer diagnosis. In this study, we hypothesised that the time it took to start treatment would have an impact on health outcomes: the longer patients waited the worse their outcomes would be. We did not have outcomes in the data but we could compute time to treatment initiation (TTI). While assessing the impact of the oncology insurance scheme on TTI, we encountered a substantial sudden increase in average TTI in June 2018 which we needed to explore. Methods: We conducted our analysis using R, a statistical computing software, for interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) on Nairobi Cancer Registry data to assess the impact of the introduction of the oncology insurance scheme on TTI in days among Nairobi County residents diagnosed with cancer. We calculated the monthly median TTI, resulting in 120 data points (one for each of the 120 months of the observation period - January 1st 2010 to December 31st 2019). Since the oncology insurance scheme was available to the entire Kenyan population, a suitable control group was unavailable. To address this, we used auto regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modelling to forecast an expected trend, allowing us to estimate both sudden and gradual changes during April 2015 and June 2018 (intervention months). Results: After cleaning the data, 7584 (35%) cases of the original 21,464 were left for analysis. Females were more than males at 57.8%. Approximately 65% of the cases with known stage at diagnosis were in stages III and IV. No statistically significant impact was associated with the introduction of oncology insurance scheme; an additional 9.06 days (95% CI: −8.7 to 26.8) and a gradual change of 0.88 days per month (95% CI: −0.11 to 1.88). However, a statistically significant sudden increase in monthly median TTI in June 2018 of 34.6 days (95% CI 15.4 to 53.8) and the gradual change of −1.6 days (95% CI −3.5 to 0.4) per month which was not statistically significant, were associated with a healthcare workers’ strike. We could not accurately analyse case trends from these data because the registry had not completed collating data for the later years (2015–2019). Conclusions: These results suggest that the oncology insurance scheme may not have reduced average TTI for the cancer patients as we had hypothesized. However, a healthcare workers’ strike (based on corroboration with findings from the 2018 Kenya Household Health Expenditure and Utilization Survey), increased the average TTI among these patients. Data science techniques and ITSAs using cancer registry data is a cost-effective method to answer important population-level research questions in resource-limited settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Robai Gakunga & Anne Korir & Janet Bouttell, 2025. "Evaluating the impact of the National Health Insurance Fund oncology benefits package and a healthcare workers’ strike on time to cancer treatment initiation in Nairobi County, Kenya: An interrupted t," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324593
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324593
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324593&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0324593?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.