IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0324548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of methods for identifying multimorbidity patterns among people with opioid use disorder: A retrospective single-cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Myanca Rodrigues
  • Tea Rosic
  • Glenda Babe
  • Brittany B Dennis
  • Alannah McEvoy
  • Richard Perez
  • Claire de Oliveira
  • Sameer Parpia
  • Zainab Samaan
  • Lehana Thabane

Abstract

Background: Multimorbidity, the presence of two or more (2+) chronic conditions, presents significant challenges for healthcare delivery, particularly among populations with opioid use disorder (OUD). Multimorbidity patterns among individuals with OUD are not well established, and minimal research exists examining the impact of clustering methods on identifying these patterns. Objective: Our study aimed to assess multimorbidity prevalence, explore associated sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and determine multimorbidity patterns using hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and K-means clustering among people receiving treatment for OUD in Ontario, Canada between 2011 and 2021. Methods: Data from two prospective cohort studies were merged and linked to Ontario provincial health administrative databases. We identified 16 chronic conditions, used in prior research examining multimorbidity in Ontario, using ICD-10-CA diagnostic codes and the diagnostic codes of physician billing claims using a 2-year lookback. Multimorbidity was defined as the presence of 2+ of the above conditions, excluding the diagnosis of OUD. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, following the participants for eight years in the data holdings to ascertain the prevalence of multimorbidity. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed using modified Poisson regression models, and multimorbidity patterns were identified through HCA and K-means clustering. Results: Among 3,430 people with OUD, 32.5% (n = 1,114, 95% confidence interval (CI)=30.9, 34.1) experienced multimorbidity over an eight-year period, with older age (Prevalence Ratio (PR)=3.39, 95% CI = 2.36, 4.87) and unemployment (PR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.13, 1.54) associated with increased prevalence. HCA identified six distinct disease clusters, whereas K-means clustering identified four clusters. Both methods identified groupings of cardiovascular (coronary syndrome), cardiometabolic (diabetes, hypertension), and respiratory (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) diseases, reflecting shared comorbidities among people with OUD. Discussion: Our findings highlight the substantial burden of multimorbidity among populations with OUD, and the importance of considering sociodemographic factors in understanding multimorbidity prevalence. Moreover, the choice of clustering method significantly influences the identification and interpretation of multimorbidity patterns, with HCA providing more clinically meaningful groupings compared to K-means clustering. Our findings highlight the need for clinicians to tailor care plans and for policymakers to prioritize integrated healthcare delivery strategies to address the complex health needs of people with OUD.

Suggested Citation

  • Myanca Rodrigues & Tea Rosic & Glenda Babe & Brittany B Dennis & Alannah McEvoy & Richard Perez & Claire de Oliveira & Sameer Parpia & Zainab Samaan & Lehana Thabane, 2025. "Comparative analysis of methods for identifying multimorbidity patterns among people with opioid use disorder: A retrospective single-cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324548
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324548
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324548&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0324548?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.