IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0324532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk and prognosis of second primary malignancies in patients with follicular lymphoma in the era of rituximab: A population study based on the SEER database

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Tian
  • Wanxi Yang
  • Juan Xu
  • Yuanxiao Li
  • Wenjiao Tang
  • Caigang Xu

Abstract

Objective: Follicular lymphoma (FL) patients have achieved favorable long-term survival since the introduction of rituximab. However, the development of second primary malignancies (SPMs) indicates a poor survival prognosis for FL patients, and large-scale studies in this field remain limited. This study investigates the prognostic factors for FL patients in the rituximab era, as well as the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and prognosis for patients who developed SPMs. Methods: From 2000 to 2020, a total of 33,104 patients with pathologically confirmed FL were identified within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Competing-risk regression analysis was used to assess prognostic factors for lymphoma-specific survival (LSS), risk factors for developing SPMs, and prognosis in FL patients. Results: Multivariate analysis identified age ≥ 40 years, Black race, unmarried status, non-urban residence, nodal lymphoma presentation, Grade 3 histology, advanced Ann Arbor stage, and B symptoms as independent adverse prognostic factors for both overall survival (OS) and LSS. Chemotherapy as initial treatment was associated with inferior LSS in FL patients. Protective factors for OS and LSS included female sex, higher income, diagnosis post-2005, diagnosis-to-treatment intervals >1 month, and receipt of radiotherapy or surgery. SPMs correlated with reduced LSS risk in FL patients. Elevated SPM incidence among patients aged>40years, and non-Hispanic ethnicity, while reduced SPM risks were observed in females, unmarried patients, those receiving non-radiotherapy initial treatment, Grade 3 cases, and patients diagnosed during 2015–2019. Notably, FL patients aged >60 years, unmarried, and those diagnosed post-2010 demonstrated heightened OS risk following SPM development. Conversely, initial radiotherapy conferred protective effects against both OS and LSS in patients with SPMs. Conclusion: In this study, we conducted a large, population-based analysis across the United States to identify risk factors for the development of SPMs and to delineate prognostic indicators for FL patients in the context of rituximab therapy, along with the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and prognostic features associated with SPMs. These findings have translational implications for risk-adapted surveillance. Future studies should validate predictive models across diverse healthcare settings, elucidate molecular mechanisms of SPM pathogenesis in FL, and evaluate targeted screening interventions through prospective trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Tian & Wanxi Yang & Juan Xu & Yuanxiao Li & Wenjiao Tang & Caigang Xu, 2025. "Risk and prognosis of second primary malignancies in patients with follicular lymphoma in the era of rituximab: A population study based on the SEER database," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324532
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324532
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324532&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0324532?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.