IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0324378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protocol for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of Mongolia’s sugar-sweetened beverages tax using double machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • Nyamdavaa Byambadorj
  • Rohan Best
  • Undram Mandakh
  • Kompal Sinha

Abstract

Elevated consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) has been associated with an increase in obesity, type 2 diabetes, and other non-communicable diseases (NCDs), a significant health and economic burden on Mongolia. To address this, the government has introduced a 20% SSB tax set to take effect in 2027. This study conducts a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) using a Markov cohort model, incorporating Double Machine Learning (DML) to estimate price elasticity and assess policy-driven consumption changes while addressing potential confounding. The analysis integrates DML-estimated price elasticity and consumption shifts with disease transition probabilities, simulating outcomes for the 2023 Mongolian population, aged over 15 years old, over two time horizons of 20 years and a lifetime. The model estimates changes in obesity prevalence, healthcare costs, and disease burden, translating them into Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) averted, and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) gained. Tax revenue projections and sensitivity analyses further assess the robustness of assumptions. By combining machine learning-based causal inference with economic modelling, this study provides policy-relevant evidence on the cost-effectiveness of SSB taxation, supporting data-driven decision-making for public health strategies in Mongolia, highlighting the tax’s potential to reduce the burden of NCDs and promote healthier behaviours.

Suggested Citation

  • Nyamdavaa Byambadorj & Rohan Best & Undram Mandakh & Kompal Sinha, 2025. "Protocol for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of Mongolia’s sugar-sweetened beverages tax using double machine learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324378
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324378
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324378&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0324378?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.