IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0324288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The weekend effect on 28-day mortality in septic patients admitted to the ICU: A retrospective study from the MIMIC-IV database

Author

Listed:
  • Jianmin Qu
  • Tingting Wang
  • Xiaoyu Zhou
  • Congcong Lv
  • Jiayi Chen
  • Shuhao Que

Abstract

Objective: Numerous studies have shown that patients admitted on weekends or holidays have higher mortality rates and poorer prognoses than those admitted on weekdays. However, the specific impact of the weekend effect on patients with sepsis remains unclear and requires further investigation. Methods: This study included adult patients with sepsis who were first admitted to the ICU and stayed for ≥24 hours, using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV (version 2.2),with the data collection period from 2008 to 2019. Data on age, gender, type of ICU admission, vital signs, disease severity scores, and medications were collected, with patients categorized into weekend and weekday admission groups. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, while secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality, hospital mortality, ICU mortality, and survival days without vasoactive drugs, ventilator, or ICU stay. COX regression analyses with propensity score matching (PSM) were employed to assess the impact of weekend admissions on the survival of septic patients in the ICU. Results: A total of 20,261 septic patients met the inclusion criteria, with 14,469 in the weekday group and 5,792 in the weekend group. The weekend admission group showed no statistically significant differences in 28-day mortality, hospital mortality, ICU mortality, survival days without vasoactive drugs, survival days without ventilator, survival days without ICU, and length of ICU stay compared to the weekday group. Subgroup analyses for 28-day mortality revealed that key baseline characteristics such as gender, age, BMI, race, ICU type, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and SOFA score did not independently influence the prognosis of patients with sepsis based on weekend admission. Conclusion: The study found no significant weekend effect on the prognosis of septic patients admitted to the ICU, based on both univariate and multivariate analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianmin Qu & Tingting Wang & Xiaoyu Zhou & Congcong Lv & Jiayi Chen & Shuhao Que, 2025. "The weekend effect on 28-day mortality in septic patients admitted to the ICU: A retrospective study from the MIMIC-IV database," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324288
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324288
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324288&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0324288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.