IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0324258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The association of sarcopenia, possible sarcopenia and cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jiahui Huang
  • Min Li
  • Qiangqiang Luo
  • Jing Li

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to investigate the relationship between sarcopenia, possible sarcopenia, and cognitive impairment, and to analyze the impact of potential moderating factors. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, EmBase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Databases, VIP and SinoMed from inception until March 2025. The quality of cross-sectional studies was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Scale, while the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of included case-control and cohort studies. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were employed to explore potential moderating variables and heterogeneity. Results: A total of 31 studies were included in this systematic review, of which 27 studies were quantitatively analyzed. The meta-analysis revealed that both sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia significantly associated with cognitive impairment (OR=1.88, 95%CI = 1.71–2.08), (OR=1.96, 95%CI = 1.50–2.58). Subgroup analyses revealed a stronger association between sarcopenia and cognitive impairment in specific demographics: among females with sarcopenia (OR=3.22, 95%CI = 1.23–8.40), in Asian populations (OR=1.96, 95%CI = 1.76–2.18), and within hospital settings (OR=3.12, 95%CI = 2.18–4.48). These findings underscore the influence of gender, ethnicity, and healthcare environment on the relationship between sarcopenia and cognitive impairment. An assessment of publication bias within studies providing adjusted odds ratios indicated potential bias. However, sensitivity analyses and trim-and-filling analyses confirmed the robustness of our findings, suggesting that the observed associations remain reliable despite the presence of publication bias. Conclusions: Individuals with sarcopenia or possible sarcopenia have approximately twice the odds of developing cognitive impairment compared to those without sarcopenia. Implementing systematic screening and targeted interventions for possible sarcopenia patients is essential to prevent from cognitive decline. Specifically, healthcare professionals should focus on women and inpatients with sarcopenia, employing proactive measures to avert cognitive impairment.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiahui Huang & Min Li & Qiangqiang Luo & Jing Li, 2025. "The association of sarcopenia, possible sarcopenia and cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324258
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324258
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324258&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0324258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.