IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0324228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence of crisis pregnancy center attendance among women in four U.S. states

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa JK Yang
  • Mikaela H Smith
  • Megan L Kavanaugh
  • JaNelle M Ricks
  • Maria F Gallo

Abstract

Objectives: Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) typically hold missions of preventing abortion, opposing contraception, and promoting abstinence outside of marriage. They often lack transparency about their services, posing as medical facilities or even as abortion clinics. Given the lack of evidence on the extent to which people use crisis pregnancy centers, we sought to quantify the prevalence of ever attendance at a CPC among adult, reproductive-aged women from Survey of Women data from four states. Study design: We analyzed cross-sectional data from population-representative surveys conducted among adult, reproductive-age women in 2018–2019 in Iowa (N = 2,425) and in 2019–2020 in Arizona (N = 2,132), New Jersey (N = 2,132), and Wisconsin (N = 2,095). Using survey weights, we calculated the prevalences of ever CPC attendance among those with a history of pregnancy or testing for pregnancy. We focused on this subset as this comprises the women who might have had cause to attend a CPC. We also used Poisson regression to test associations between demographic correlates and ever attendance by state. Results: Prevalence of ever CPC attendance in adult, reproductive-age women with a history of pregnancy or testing for pregnancy was statistically significantly higher in Arizona (20.2%; 95% CI, 17.6%-23.1%) compared to Iowa (14.5%; 95% CI, 12.6%-16.7%), Wisconsin (14.3%; 95% CI, 12.1%-16.8%).), and New Jersey (11.6%; 95% CI, 9.6%-13.8%). Age, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status were not correlated with ever CPC attendance among women with a history of pregnancy or testing for pregnancy in Arizona, Iowa, and New Jersey. In Wisconsin, prevalence was lower among those in the lowest socioeconomic stratum. Conclusions: Ever attendance at CPCs is not rare, ranging from 11.6%-20.2% in the four states evaluated. The present study serves as an important baseline given that the prevalence may change as pregnancy options become increasingly restricted.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa JK Yang & Mikaela H Smith & Megan L Kavanaugh & JaNelle M Ricks & Maria F Gallo, 2025. "Prevalence of crisis pregnancy center attendance among women in four U.S. states," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-9, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324228
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324228
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324228&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0324228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.