IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0324156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aging dimensions and markers as relative predictors of mortality in a longitudinal epidemiological sample

Author

Listed:
  • Kristian E Markon
  • Frank D Mann
  • Colin D Freilich
  • Steve Cole
  • Robert F Krueger

Abstract

Measurement of aging is critical to understanding its causes and developing interventions, but little consensus exists on what components such measurements should include or how they perform in predicting mortality. The aim of this study was to identify factors of aging among a comprehensive set of indicators, and to evaluate their relative performance in predicting mortality. Measurements on 34 clinical, survey, and neuroimaging variables, along with epigenetic age markers, were obtained from two waves (2004–2021) of the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study. Mortality data was also available on 11875 participants, including 1908 twins. Factor analyses were used to identify aging factors, and these were used to predict mortality as of 2022. Twin data were used to model predictors of mortality within families. Factor analyses identified 9 major dimensions of aging: frailty, cognition, adiposity, glucose, blood pressure, inflammation, lipids, adaptive functioning, and neurological functioning. The strongest predictors of survival among the aging dimensions were cognition, adaptive functioning, and inflammation, and among the epigenetic markers, the decline-predictive markers (GrimAge and DunedinPACE). When entered in joint prediction models, cognition remained a significant predictor of mortality, but the epigenetic markers did not. Cognition, adaptive functioning, and inflammation remained significant predictors of mortality within twin pairs as well. Aging is a multidimensional construct, with cognition, adaptive functioning, and inflammation being the strongest predictors of survival among the aging dimensions examined. Their association with mortality is observed within families, suggesting that early developmental factors cannot entirely account for their association with survival. Interventions and assessments should prioritize cognition in measures of aging quality, along with adaptive functioning and inflammation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristian E Markon & Frank D Mann & Colin D Freilich & Steve Cole & Robert F Krueger, 2025. "Aging dimensions and markers as relative predictors of mortality in a longitudinal epidemiological sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-10, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324156
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324156
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324156&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0324156?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.