IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0324107.html

Predicting dominant terrestrial biomes at a global scale using machine learning algorithms, climate variable indices, and extreme event indices

Author

Listed:
  • Hisashi Sato

Abstract

Understanding the global distribution of biomes is essential for biodiversity conservation, climate modeling, and land-use planning. Traditional approaches often summarize climate data into indices, and recent models sometimes include extreme events such as severe droughts or rare cold spells. This study evaluates how the choice of machine learning algorithm, climate data summarization, and extreme climate indices affect the accuracy and robustness of global biome modeling. Four algorithms were tested: random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), naive Bayes (NV), and LeNet convolutional neural network (CNN). RF and CNN achieved the highest accuracy, with CNN preferred due to RF’s stronger overfitting. Summarizing climate data into indices reduced accuracy by 1–2%, while adding extreme indices increased accuracy by

Suggested Citation

  • Hisashi Sato, 2026. "Predicting dominant terrestrial biomes at a global scale using machine learning algorithms, climate variable indices, and extreme event indices," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324107
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324107
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324107&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0324107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.