IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0323873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and validation of an interpretable longitudinal preeclampsia risk prediction using machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • Braden W Eberhard
  • Raphael Y Cohen
  • Nolan Wheeler
  • Ricardo Kleinlein
  • John Rigoni
  • David W Bates
  • Kathryn J Gray
  • Vesela P Kovacheva

Abstract

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-specific disease characterized by new onset hypertension after 20 weeks of gestation that affects 2–8% of all pregnancies and contributes to up to 26% of maternal deaths. Despite extensive clinical research, current predictive tools fail to identify up to 66% of patients who develop preeclampsia. We sought to develop a tool to longitudinally predict preeclampsia risk. In this retrospective model development and validation study, we examined a large cohort of patients who delivered at three hospitals in the New England region between 05/2015 and 05/2023. We used sociodemographic, clinical diagnoses, family history, laboratory, and vital signs data. For external validation, we used the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (nuMoM2b) cohort (2010–2013), which contained data from eight external sites in the US. Models were developed at eight gestational time points using logistic regression, elastic net, naïve-Bayes, random forest, xgboost, and deep neural network methods. We used Shapley values to investigate the relationships between features. Our study population (N = 101,357) had an incidence of preeclampsia of 6.1% (N = 6,160). Model AUCs ranged from 0.71–0.80 (95%CI 0.69–0.82), externally validated in the nuMoM2b cohort with an AUC range of 0.57–0.70 (95%CI 0.55–0.73). No significant differences in performance were found based on race and ethnicity. As these novel models identify more patients at risk for developing preeclampsia, the benefits of this approach need to be balanced with the need for surveillance in a larger at-risk population. This novel preeclampsia prediction approach allows clinicians to identify at-risk patients early and provide personalized predictions throughout pregnancy.

Suggested Citation

  • Braden W Eberhard & Raphael Y Cohen & Nolan Wheeler & Ricardo Kleinlein & John Rigoni & David W Bates & Kathryn J Gray & Vesela P Kovacheva, 2025. "Development and validation of an interpretable longitudinal preeclampsia risk prediction using machine learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323873
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323873
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323873&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0323873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.