IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0323741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the accuracy of Apple Watch VO2 max measurements: A validation study

Author

Listed:
  • Rory Lambe
  • Ben O’Grady
  • Maximus Baldwin
  • Cailbhe Doherty

Abstract

VO2 max is a measure of cardiorespiratory fitness and a key indicator of overall health. It is predictive of cardiovascular events and shows a strong inverse association with all-cause mortality. Increased cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with reductions in coronary artery disease, diabetes and cancer. Apple Watch offers a less resource-intensive and more feasible alternative to the gold standard assessment for VO2 max, indirect calorimetry, but the accuracy of its measurements remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the validity of VO2 max estimates from Apple Watch in comparison to indirect calorimetry. Thirty participants wore an Apple Watch for 5-10 days to generate a VO2 max estimate. Subsequently, they underwent a maximal exercise treadmill test in accordance with the modified Åstrand protocol. The agreement between measurements from Apple Watch and indirect calorimetry was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and mean absolute error (MAE). Overall, Apple Watch underestimated VO2 max, with a mean difference of 6.07 mL/kg/min (95% CI 3.77–8.38). Limits of agreement indicated variability between measurement methods (lower -6.11 mL/kg/min; upper 18.26 mL/kg/min). MAPE was calculated as 13.31% (95% CI 10.01–16.61), and MAE was 6.92 mL/kg/min (95% CI 4.89–8.94). These findings indicate that Apple Watch VO2 max estimates require further refinement prior to clinical implementation. However, further consideration of Apple Watch as an alternative to conventional VO2 max prediction from submaximal exercise is warranted, given its practical utility.

Suggested Citation

  • Rory Lambe & Ben O’Grady & Maximus Baldwin & Cailbhe Doherty, 2025. "Investigating the accuracy of Apple Watch VO2 max measurements: A validation study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323741
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323741
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323741&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0323741?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.