IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0323713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence of family-based elder abuse and its associated factors in Gandaki Province of Western Nepal: A cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Bharat Kafle
  • Aman Shrestha
  • Saruna Ghimire
  • Preeti Bhattarai
  • Pratik Bhattarai
  • Amod Kumar Poudyal

Abstract

Background: Elder abuse is a rarely discussed public health and human rights issue in Nepal, largely due to traditional values emphasizing reverence for parents. These cultural norms can discourage recognition and reporting, especially within families. Consequently, nationwide or large-scale data on this issue is lacking. This study aims to estimate the prevalence and explore the factors associated with family-based elder abuse in Gandaki province, western Nepal. Methods: A cross-sectional design was conducted interviewing 612 participants (≥ 60 years) in household settings. The study areas, representing mountain, hill and tarai regions of Gandaki province, were randomly selected using multistage stratified sampling process. The dependent variable was measured using 17-item elder abuse scale. Multivariable logistic regression explored the factors associated with elder abuse. Results: More than half of the participants were from Nawalpur (57.2%), urban residents (68.1%), female (57.2%), without education (79.8%), and lived in multigenerational households (73.0%). The overall prevalence of elder abuse was reported at 56.4%, with caregiver neglect (50.8%) being the most prevalent sub-type. The prevalence was higher among females (66.6%) than males (42.8%). In adjusted multivariable logistic regression, those who were female (AOR = 2.56, 95%CI: 1.64–4.01), older than 70 years (AOR = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.03–2.29), reluctant to disclose health issues to family members (AOR = 2.13, 95%CI: 1.36–3.34), believed in traditional healers (AOR = 1.89, 95%CI: 1.28–2.77) and lived in nuclear households (AOR = 1.85, 95%CI: 1.19–2.89) had higher odds of elder abuse. Those living in rural areas (AOR = 0.39, 95%CI: 0.25–0.61), having formal education (AOR = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.10–0.95), and having good self-reported health (AOR = 0.23, 95%CI: 0.12–0.46) were associated with lower odds of elder abuse. Conclusions: The study highlights a high prevalence of elder abuse, particularly caregiver neglect, with a disproportionate impact on women. Policy recommendations include raising awareness, strengthening legal protections, and improving caregiver training to meet these challenges effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Bharat Kafle & Aman Shrestha & Saruna Ghimire & Preeti Bhattarai & Pratik Bhattarai & Amod Kumar Poudyal, 2025. "Prevalence of family-based elder abuse and its associated factors in Gandaki Province of Western Nepal: A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323713
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323713
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323713&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0323713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.