IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0323651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in COVID-19 testing perceptions among caregivers of children with medical complexity by rurality

Author

Listed:
  • Kristina Devi Singh-Verdeflor
  • Michelle M Kelly
  • Gregory P DeMuri
  • Gemma Warner
  • Sabrina M Butteris
  • Mary L Ehlenbach
  • Barbara Katz
  • Joseph A McBride
  • Shawn Koval
  • Ryan J Coller

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 testing safeguards the health of children with medical complexity (CMC) through several key mechanisms, such as the implementation of clinical action plans and COVID-19-directed therapies. However, testing utility is limited by barriers to access and perceptions surrounding use. This study investigated associations between rurality and COVID-19 testing access, intent, motivators, and concerns for caregivers of CMC. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey (April – June 2022) of English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers of children with at least one complex chronic condition between ages 5–17 at an academic medical center in the Midwestern USA. Rurality was dichotomized using Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. Outcomes represented COVID-19 testing access, intent, motivators, and concerns. Covariates included demographic and clinical characteristics. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses examined associations between rurality and each outcome. Results: Among 1,432 responses (response rate 49%), 359 (25%) were classified as rural. Respondents had varied education, income, and insurance levels. In the multivariable models, rural and urban caregivers reported similarly high testing access, but rural caregivers had significantly less testing intent (adjusted Odds Ratio [95% CI]: 0.53, [0.40, 0.71]). Notably, rural caregivers were significantly more likely to indicate “It will be difficult to get needed healthcare if my child has it” (2.49 [1.19, 5.18]). Conclusions: While rural and urban CMC caregivers reported generally high access and ease of COVID-19 testing, potentially modifiable factors exist to improve testing intention and decrease barriers, including communication regarding testing utility and timing as well as access to effective treatment response upon testing positive.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristina Devi Singh-Verdeflor & Michelle M Kelly & Gregory P DeMuri & Gemma Warner & Sabrina M Butteris & Mary L Ehlenbach & Barbara Katz & Joseph A McBride & Shawn Koval & Ryan J Coller, 2025. "Differences in COVID-19 testing perceptions among caregivers of children with medical complexity by rurality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323651
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323651
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323651&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0323651?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.