IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0323625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of visual performance between monofocal and rotationally asymmetric refractive intraocular lenses

Author

Listed:
  • Masaki Miyoshi
  • Hirotaka Tanabe
  • Tomohiro Shojo
  • Tomofusa Yamauchi
  • Kosuke Takase
  • Hitoshi Tabuchi

Abstract

We compared the visual performance of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) (ZCB00) and a rotationally asymmetric refractive IOL with +1.5 diopters near addition (Lentis Comfort LS-313 MF15) by investigating the ten-week postoperative parameters of both eyes of cataract patients who underwent bilateral implantation with one of the two IOLs within three months between 2011 and 2019. A total of 1352 eyes of 676 patients were enrolled; the ZCB00 group comprised 904 eyes of 452 patients (72.3 ± 6.8 years; females/males, 268/184), and the LS-313 MF15 group included 448 eyes of 224 patients (73.6 ± 7.0 years; females/males, 125/99). Comparisons were made with a linear mixed-effects model, strictly adjusting for sex, age, subjective refraction spherical equivalent, subjective refraction cylinder, corneal astigmatism, axial length, corneal higher-order aberrations, and pupil diameter to ensure statistical validity. The corrected distance visual acuity was significantly better, and most of the higher-order aberrations were significantly smaller in the ZCB00 group (p

Suggested Citation

  • Masaki Miyoshi & Hirotaka Tanabe & Tomohiro Shojo & Tomofusa Yamauchi & Kosuke Takase & Hitoshi Tabuchi, 2025. "Comparison of visual performance between monofocal and rotationally asymmetric refractive intraocular lenses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323625
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323625
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323625&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0323625?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.