IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0323487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of landslide susceptibility based on SMOTE-Tomek sampling and machine learning algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Ming-zhou Lv
  • Kun-lun Li
  • Jia-zeng Cai
  • Jun Mao
  • Jia-jun Gao
  • Hui Xu

Abstract

Landslides are frequent and hazardous geological disasters, posing significant risks to human safety and infrastructure. Accurate assessments of landslide susceptibility are crucial for risk management and mitigation. However, geological surveys of landslide areas are typically conducted at the township level, have lowsample sizes, and rely on experience. This study proposes a framework for assessing landslide susceptibility in Taiping Township, Zhejiang Province, China, using data balancing, machine learning, and data from 1,325 slope units with nine slope characteristics. The dataset was balanced using the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique and the Tomek link undersampling method (SMOTE-Tomek). A comparative analysis of six machine learning models was performed, and the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to assess the influencing factors. The results indicate that the machine learning algorithms provide high accuracy, and the random forest (RF) algorithm achieves the optimum model accuracy (0.791, F1 = 0.723). The very low, low, medium, and high sensitivity zones account for 92.27%, 5.12%, 1.78%, and 0.83% of the area, respectively. The height of cut slopes has the most significant impact on landslide sensitivity, whereas the altitude has a minor impact. The proposed model accurately assesses landslide susceptibility at the township scale, providing valuable insights for risk management and mitigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming-zhou Lv & Kun-lun Li & Jia-zeng Cai & Jun Mao & Jia-jun Gao & Hui Xu, 2025. "Evaluation of landslide susceptibility based on SMOTE-Tomek sampling and machine learning algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-26, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323487
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323487
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323487&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0323487?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.