IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0323390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Top-funded digital health companies offering lifestyle interventions for dementia prevention: Company overview and evidence analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Rasita Vinay
  • Jonas Probst
  • Panitda Huynh
  • Mathias Schlögl
  • Tobias Kowatsch
  • Marcia Nißen

Abstract

Background and objective: Dementia prevention has been recognized as a top priority by public health authorities due to the lack of a reversible cure. In this regard, digital dementia-preventive lifestyle services (DDLS) emerge as potentially pivotal services, aiming to address modifiable risk factors on a large scale. This study aims to identify the top-funded companies offering DDLS and evaluate their clinical evidence to gain insights into the international service landscape. Methods: A systematic screening of two financial databases (Pitchbook and Crunchbase) was conducted. Corresponding published clinical evidence was collected through a systematic literature review and analyzed regarding study purpose, results, quality of results, and level of clinical evidence. Findings: The ten top-funded companies offering DDLS received a total funding of EUR 128.52 million, of which three companies collected more than 75%. Clinical evidence was limited due to only nine eligible publications, small clinical subject groups, the absence of longitudinal study designs, and no direct evidence of dementia prevention. Conclusion: Our study shows that the level of funding received by companies does not reflect the clinical effectiveness of DDLS. The study serves as an initial step toward understanding how DDLS are currently evaluated in today’s market and highlights the need for a more rigorous evaluation of DDLS effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Rasita Vinay & Jonas Probst & Panitda Huynh & Mathias Schlögl & Tobias Kowatsch & Marcia Nißen, 2025. "Top-funded digital health companies offering lifestyle interventions for dementia prevention: Company overview and evidence analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323390
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323390
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323390&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0323390?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.