IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0323342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of perioperative lidocaine infusion on the subjective quality of recovery after surgery: Protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Qianli Huang
  • Changhui Shao
  • Wei Wei
  • Shan Ou

Abstract

Background: Lidocaine is increasingly used for surgical patients requiring general anesthesia. However, its clinical benefits on postoperative recovery quality are not well established. Our main objective aims to summarize the evidence regarding the effectiveness of perioperative lidocaine infusion on postoperative subjective quality of recovery (QoR). Methods and analysis: This protocol will be conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) guideline. This systematic review will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their inception until December 31st, 2024 with no language restrictions. The major databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library will be comprehensively searched and supplemented by a hand searching reference lists of all included articles. Searches will involve studies assessing the efficacy of the perioperative lidocaine infusion for improving postoperative QoR, in comparison to placebo, or on treatment. The two authors will independently screen studies, extract study data and assess bias risk of the studies. The subjective QoR (QoR-15, QoR-40) on postoperative day 1–3 will be defined as primary outcome, whereas secondary outcomes will include morphine consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to first bowel movement, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay. A meta-analysis will be performed using Review Manager 5.3 software. Sensitivity analyses, subgroup analysis and publication bias will also be conducted. The evidence quality of pooled results will be assessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Discussion: This review and meta-analysis is anticipated to provide the evidence for the role of intravenous lidocaine on the subjective quality of recovery after surgery. In addition, the findings from this review will help clinicians with developing effective and safe perioperative anesthetic management regimens for surgery patients. Study registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024585866

Suggested Citation

  • Qianli Huang & Changhui Shao & Wei Wei & Shan Ou, 2025. "Effect of perioperative lidocaine infusion on the subjective quality of recovery after surgery: Protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-8, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323342
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323342
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323342&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0323342?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.