IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0323333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Mallows-like criterion for anomaly detection with random forest implementation

Author

Listed:
  • GaoXiang Zhao
  • Lu Wang
  • Xiaoqiang Wang

Abstract

Anomaly detection plays a crucial role in fields such as information security and industrial production. It relies on the identification of rare instances that deviate significantly from expected patterns. Reliance on a single model can introduce uncertainty, as it may not adequately capture the complexity and variability inherent in real-world datasets. Under the framework of model averaging, this paper proposes a criterion for the selection of weights in the aggregation of multiple models, employing a focal loss function with Mallows’ form to assign weights to the base models. This strategy is integrated into a random forest algorithm by replacing the conventional voting method. Empirical evaluations conducted on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms classical anomaly detection algorithms while surpassing conventional model averaging techniques based on minimizing standard loss functions. These results highlight a notable enhancement in both accuracy and robustness, indicating that model averaging methods can effectively mitigate the challenges posed by data imbalance.

Suggested Citation

  • GaoXiang Zhao & Lu Wang & Xiaoqiang Wang, 2025. "A Mallows-like criterion for anomaly detection with random forest implementation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323333
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323333
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323333&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0323333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.