IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0323297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business and entrepreneurship is declining as scholarly field: Empirical evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Wim Naudé

Abstract

This paper presents evidence from 68,792 papers published between 1961 and 2020 that progress in the scholarly field of business and entrepreneurship is declining. It is found that the annual number of papers published in the field has increased exponentially since the Second World War, growing on average by 17% annually since 1961; the average disruption score of papers have declined by a factor of 36 between the 1960s and the 2010s; and that the average team size per paper has increased from 1,6 between 1960–1980–2,4 between 2000 and 2020. Estimates from an ideas production function suggest that the field is getting fished out and that researchers may be stepping on one another’s toes. A Wald-test indicates that a structural break in the disruptiveness of business and entrepreneurship and papers occurred around 1999. These results could reflect pathologies in how research in the field is organized and/or that the field has matured.

Suggested Citation

  • Wim Naudé, 2025. "Business and entrepreneurship is declining as scholarly field: Empirical evidence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-10, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323297
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323297
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323297&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0323297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.