IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0323278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of gestational weight gain during pregnancy in a multiethnic UK-based population: Findings from the Born in Bradford cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Petra A T Araújo
  • Maria A Quigley
  • Gillian Santorelli
  • Victoria Coathup

Abstract

Introduction: Unhealthy maternal weight gain during pregnancy is associated with deleterious outcomes to mothers and their offspring. Current literature on the determinants of gestational weight gain yields inconsistent results, with limited research conducted in the United Kingdom. This study investigates potential determinants of unhealthy gestational weight gain in a multiethnic cohort within Bradford, United Kingdom. Methods: The study analysed 7,769 singleton pregnancies from the Born in Bradford Cohort. Women were enrolled at ~26 weeks’ gestation. Weight at first antenatal appointment, recruitment and/or third trimester were used to calculate weekly average weight gain. This was categorized as ‘less than recommended’, ‘recommended’ or ‘more than recommended’ based on the Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria. Associations between potential determinants and gestational weight gain were assessed using multinomial logistic regression with recommended gestational weight gain as the reference. Results: Overall, 22.4% of women gained weight within the recommended range; 20.3% gained less than recommended, and 57.3% gained more than recommended. Key risk factors for gaining less weight than recommended were unhealthy baseline BMI (aOR=1.78 for underweight, aOR=1.3 for obese), higher parity (e.g. aOR=1.46 for 3 + children) and lower socioeconomic status (aOR=1.4). The strongest risk factors for gaining more weight than recommended were high baseline BMI (e.g. aOR=5.86 for obese) and higher psychiatric morbidity score (aOR=1.22); being underweight (aOR=0.58) and higher parity (e.g. aOR=0.70 for 3 + children) were associated with a lower risk of gaining more weight than recommended. The effect of mental health seemed to be particularly important among women of Pakistani background, while parity seemed to play a major role among White British women. Conclusion: Baseline BMI, age, socioeconomic position, parity and mental health are associated with unhealthy weight gain during pregnancy in a multiethnic UK population. These findings can help identify at-risk women and inform targeted preventative strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Petra A T Araújo & Maria A Quigley & Gillian Santorelli & Victoria Coathup, 2025. "Determinants of gestational weight gain during pregnancy in a multiethnic UK-based population: Findings from the Born in Bradford cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323278
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323278
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323278&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0323278?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.