IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0323234.html

Costs and cost-effectiveness of the Safer Births Bundle of Care intervention in Tanzania health facilities

Author

Listed:
  • Boniphace Marwa
  • Corinna Vossius
  • Jan Terje Kvaløy
  • Benjamin Kamala
  • Pascal Mdoe
  • Hege Langli Ersdal
  • Frida N Ngalesoni
  • Albino Kalolo
  • Domenica Morona

Abstract

: To reach the Sustainable Development Goals 3.1 to 3.4 for maternal, newborn, and child health, effective and cost-effective interventions are required. The Safer Births Bundle of Care (SBBC) intervention aims to improve the quality of intra- and postpartum care. The SBBC Phase I implementation was conducted in 30 health facilities in Tanzania between 2021 and 2023. Outcome data show a significant decrease in perinatal and maternal mortality. This study presents the costs of the SBBC Phase I, and a cost-effectiveness analysis, where the cost per life saved, per life year gained, and per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted, and the benefit–cost ratio (BCR) were estimated. Methods: Outcome data were based on the estimated number of newborn and maternal lives saved during the project. Cost data were collected retrospectively at the accounting centre at Haydom Lutheran Hospital. Results: The total cost for implementing SBBC Phase I was 4,491,204 USD. The cost per life saved was 4,669 USD, per life year gained 80 USD, and per DALY averted 144 USD, and the BCR was 36. Conclusion: The analysis of SBBC Phase I showed that it was highly cost-effective by World Health Organization classifications. An economic evaluation of SBBC Phase II will provide information about its sustainability and feasibility for further scaling up.

Suggested Citation

  • Boniphace Marwa & Corinna Vossius & Jan Terje Kvaløy & Benjamin Kamala & Pascal Mdoe & Hege Langli Ersdal & Frida N Ngalesoni & Albino Kalolo & Domenica Morona, 2026. "Costs and cost-effectiveness of the Safer Births Bundle of Care intervention in Tanzania health facilities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-10, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323234
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323234
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323234&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0323234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.