Author
Listed:
- Benjamin A Hives
- Mark R Beauchamp
- Yan Liu
- Jordan Weiss
- Eli Puterman
Abstract
Approximately one-fifth of Canadians report high levels of psychological stress. This is alarming, as chronic stress is associated with non-communicable diseases and premature mortality. In order to create effective interventions and public policy for stress reduction, factors associated with stress must be identified and understood. We analyzed data from the 2012 ‘Canadian Community Health Survey - Mental Health’ (CCHS-MH), including 66 potential correlates, drawn from a range of domains (e.g., psychological, physical, social, demographic factors). First, we used a random forest algorithm to determine the most important predictors of psychological stress, then we used linear regressions to quantify the linear associations between the important predictors and psychological stress. In total, 23,089 Canadian adults responded to the 2012 CCHS-MH, which was weighted to be nationally representative. Random forest analyses found that, after accounting for variance from other factors and considering complex interactions, life satisfaction (relative importance = 1.00), negative social interactions (0.99), primary stress source (0.85), and age (0.77) were the most important correlates of psychological stress. To a lesser extent, employment status (0.36), was also an important variable. Univariable linear regression suggested that these variables had effects ranging from small to medium-to-large. Multiple linear regression showed that lower life satisfaction, being younger, greater negative social interaction, reporting a primary stressor, and being employed were all found to be associated with greater psychological stress (beta range = 0.03 to 0.84, all p
Suggested Citation
Benjamin A Hives & Mark R Beauchamp & Yan Liu & Jordan Weiss & Eli Puterman, 2025.
"Multidimensional correlates of psychological stress: Insights from traditional statistical approaches and machine learning using a nationally representative Canadian sample,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-13, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0323197
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323197
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.