IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0323125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating Personalised Support in Universal Credit: Local Support, Care Responsibilities, and Claimant Experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Shuo Fei

Abstract

This paper investigates the implementation of personalised support under Universal Credit (UC) from both administrative and claimant perspectives, based on qualitative interviews conducted across two South London case study sites. While UC is designed to promote labour market participation and simplify welfare delivery, claimants encounter multiple barriers—including digital exclusion, limited access to affordable childcare, and inconsistencies in support provision. Parents with care responsibilities face heightened pressures due to tightened work requirements and upfront childcare costs, which are often regarded as limiting their ability to comply with conditionality. Local frontline staff navigate institutional pressures from multiple governance levels within a context of resource constraints, applying discretion to tailor support to individual needs. However, this discretion may result in variable practices and uneven outcomes across different service settings. The findings underscore the tensions between the policy goal of responsibilising individuals and the complex realities of claimants’ lives.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuo Fei, 2025. "Navigating Personalised Support in Universal Credit: Local Support, Care Responsibilities, and Claimant Experiences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323125
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323125
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323125&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0323125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.