IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0323023.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hepatotoxicity of ICI monotherapy or combination therapy in HCC: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yuping Lu
  • Jing Lin
  • Yufeng Lu
  • Luping Lin
  • Shicheng Zheng
  • Yu Chen
  • Sha Huang

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to reveal the hepatotoxicity profile of different immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) used strategies in patients with Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by meta-analysis. Methods: Literature was searched through PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science up to October 14, 2023, and the subject terms were “Carcinoma, Hepatocellular” and “Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors”. The main observations were alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). ALT and AST were graded according to CTCAE. Results: A total of 32 studies with 7662 patients were included in the analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that among different ICI treatment regimens, ICI monotherapy had the lowest incidence of any grade of ALT and AST elevation, and the highest for ICI+multikinase inhibitor (MKI); ICI+anti-VEGFR/VEGFA and ICI monotherapy had a lower incidence of grade ≥3 ALT and AST elevations, while ICI + MKI, dual immunotherapy, and dual immunotherapy+MKI had a higher incidence of grade ≥3 ALT and AST elevations; ICI monotherapy was more prone to any grade ALT elevation than placebo, and ICI monotherapy was more prone to ≥ 3 grade AST elevation than MKI; combination immunotherapy was more prone than MKI to any grade ALT and AST elevations; in grade ≥3 ALT and AST elevations, combination immunotherapy was similar to ICI monotherapy and MKI; ICI + MKI was more likely to have grade ≥3 ALT. Conclusion: ICI monotherapy was more likely to cause severe hepatotoxicity than MKI. Combination immunotherapy treatment increased the incidence of hepatotoxicity compared to monotherapy, and ICI + MKI was prone to develop severe hepatotoxicity.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuping Lu & Jing Lin & Yufeng Lu & Luping Lin & Shicheng Zheng & Yu Chen & Sha Huang, 2025. "Hepatotoxicity of ICI monotherapy or combination therapy in HCC: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323023
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323023
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323023&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0323023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.