IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0322884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining barriers and facilitators of dental fear treatment adoption: A qualitative study of practicing dentists

Author

Listed:
  • Jennie Ochshorn
  • Kelly A Daly
  • ViniNatalie Zaninovic
  • Richard E Heyman
  • Amy M Smith Slep
  • Mark S Wolff

Abstract

Over fifteen percent of the global population experiences dental fear, and although evidence-based treatments exist, adoption of these treatments is almost non-existent. Informed by our prior research examining barriers to adopting face-to-face behavioral treatments in dental operatories, this study examined dentists’ responses to three stepped-care Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Dental Fear (CBT-DF) formats that use technology. All approaches offer an automated component as the first step (a mobile app) and either an in-person, virtual reality (VR), or video telehealth session as the second step. This study aims to understand which of these approaches would most likely be adopted by private practice dentists and why. Eight focus groups/solo interviews with a total of 13 private practice dentists were conducted with the aim to assess barriers and facilitators to implementing three stepped-care approaches of CBT-DF. The qualitative data obtained from these interviews was coded and analyzed according to Rogers’ framework of innovation (relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability). The results indicated that participants acknowledged the value of interventions to address dental fear, as they had personal experiences with fearful patients that impacted their practices. Participants responded positively to the automated component of treatment (the app) and were more wary of treatment options requiring office space and staff time (in-person VR and in-person mental health provider). The telehealth option received the most favorable response, although some doubts were expressed regarding relative efficacy and patient accountability. Thus, dissemination of an app-telehealth treatment model that allows dentists to serve as referral partners is promising, given dentists’ incentives to decrease patient fear while avoiding opportunity cost (e.g., occupied chairs and staff time).

Suggested Citation

  • Jennie Ochshorn & Kelly A Daly & ViniNatalie Zaninovic & Richard E Heyman & Amy M Smith Slep & Mark S Wolff, 2025. "Examining barriers and facilitators of dental fear treatment adoption: A qualitative study of practicing dentists," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322884
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322884
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322884&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0322884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.