IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0322883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pacing and placing in 161-km ultramarathons: Effects of sex and age

Author

Listed:
  • Shawn E Bearden
  • Irene van Woerden

Abstract

Ultramarathons are growing in popularity, owing especially to the participation of women and masters athletes. Pacing strategy, which can vary by sex and age, is a critical variable in determining finishing place in races up to the marathon distance. Whether this is true in 161-km ultramarathons is unclear. We tested the hypotheses that pacing is a determining factor in finishing place and that pacing differs by sex and age in 161-km ultramarathons. Publicly available data from 161-km races (n = 6) were analyzed for years 2012–2022 (n = 56). Linear regression was used to analyze the proportion of time in each segment (between timing checkpoints) by place, sex, and age. In general, runners used the same percentage of their total race time in each segment independent of finishing place, sex, or age. The exception was that later finishers often ran proportionally faster at the start compared to earlier finishers. Finishing times increased with age but pacing was unaffected by age or sex. We conclude that slower finishers paced the same as faster finishers following a relatively quick start in these ultramarathons, and pacing was not consistently affected by sex or age. These findings should inform training decisions and racing strategy in 161-km ultramarathons.

Suggested Citation

  • Shawn E Bearden & Irene van Woerden, 2025. "Pacing and placing in 161-km ultramarathons: Effects of sex and age," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322883
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322883
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322883&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0322883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.