IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0322876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Animal models in preclinical metastatic breast cancer immunotherapy research: A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Yalda Mirzaei
  • Martina Hüffel
  • Sarah McCann
  • Alexandra Bannach-Brown
  • René H Tolba
  • Julia Steitz

Abstract

Breast cancer, particularly metastatic breast cancer (MBC), presents aggressive clinical challenges with limited treatment success. Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising approach, however, discrepancies between preclinical animal models and human cancers complicate translation to clinical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect of immunotherapy on primary and metastatic tumor regression in animal models of MBC and assessed the models’ appropriateness and reproducibility to improve future preclinical study design. Following a preregistered protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42021207033), we conducted searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases, yielding 2255 studies for title/abstract screening and 108 studies included after full-text screening. All included studies used mouse models, assessing primary outcomes through tumor volume or weight and metastatic outcomes via nodule count or bioluminescence. Only 14% of studies fully reported experimental animal characteristics, and 43% provided detailed experimental procedures. Of 105 articles (293 comparisons) included in the meta-analysis, pooled effect sizes indicated significant reductions in both primary and metastatic tumors. However, high heterogeneity across studies and wide prediction intervals suggested substantial variability in model responses to immunotherapy. Univariable and multivariable meta-regressions failed to significantly explain this heterogeneity, suggesting additional factors may influence outcomes. Trim-and-fill and Egger’s regression tests indicated funnel plot asymmetry, implying potential publication bias and small study effects. While our analysis demonstrated positive effects of immunotherapy on MBC and highlighted variability in animal tumor models, addressing model-related heterogeneity and enhancing methodological transparency are essential to improve reproducibility and clinical translatability.

Suggested Citation

  • Yalda Mirzaei & Martina Hüffel & Sarah McCann & Alexandra Bannach-Brown & René H Tolba & Julia Steitz, 2025. "Animal models in preclinical metastatic breast cancer immunotherapy research: A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy outcomes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322876
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322876
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322876&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0322876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.