IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0322621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Protocol: Filgotinib in addition to methotrexate versus filgotinib monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate: A multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial (FAITHFUL Study)

Author

Listed:
  • Mitsuhiro Akiyama
  • Toshihiko Hidaka
  • Motohide Kaneko
  • Satoshi Ito
  • Hiroaki Taguchi
  • Tomonori Ishii
  • Shuji Asai
  • Shintaro Hirata
  • Kei Ikeda
  • Katsuya Suzuki
  • Naoki Kato
  • Yuko Kaneko

Abstract

Background: Filgotinib (FIL), a Janus kinase-1 preferential inhibitor, has been studied for its efficacy and safety in rheumatoid arthritis. The FINCH3 trial compared FIL monotherapy, FIL plus methotrexate (MTX) combination therapy, and MTX monotherapy in MTX-naïve patients. However, comparisons in patients with an inadequate response to MTX remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FIL plus MTX versus FIL monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have an inadequate response to MTX. Methods and analysis: FAITHFUL (Filgotinib Add-on versus swITcH to Filgotinib in patients with rheUmatoid arthritis who inadequateLy responded to methotrexate) study is a phase IV multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Patients with a history of inadequate response to at least 8 weeks of MTX and moderate or high disease activity will be assessed for eligibility at 10 centers in Japan. A history of Janus kinase inhibitor use is an exclusion criterion, but prior use of biologic agents is not considered. Enrolled patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the group adding FIL (Add-on group) or the group switching to FIL monotherapy (Switch group). The target sample size is 120 participants. The primary endpoint is the change in DAS28-CRP from baseline to week 24, aiming to assess if the Switch group is non-inferior to the Add-on group. Safety will be evaluated by assessing the incidence of adverse events. Ethics and dissemination: The study has received approval from the Certified Review Board of Keio University Hospital (N20230002) and adheres to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practice standards. Prior to enrollment, all participants provide written informed consent. The findings from this study are intended to be submitted for publication in relevant peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration: The trial was registered at Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031230673).

Suggested Citation

  • Mitsuhiro Akiyama & Toshihiko Hidaka & Motohide Kaneko & Satoshi Ito & Hiroaki Taguchi & Tomonori Ishii & Shuji Asai & Shintaro Hirata & Kei Ikeda & Katsuya Suzuki & Naoki Kato & Yuko Kaneko, 2025. "Protocol: Filgotinib in addition to methotrexate versus filgotinib monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate: A multicenter, prospective, open-label," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322621
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322621
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322621&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0322621?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.