IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0322566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landslide susceptibility mapping using an entropy index-based negative sample selection strategy: A case study of Luolong county

Author

Listed:
  • Kong Yuzhong
  • Wu Hua
  • Xu Chong
  • Sun Jingjing
  • Zhu Kangcheng
  • Zhang Chenguang
  • Zhou Jianwei
  • Xu Tong
  • Su Taijin
  • Zhang Zelin
  • Kong Hui

Abstract

Landslides constitute a significant geological hazard in China, particularly in high-altitude regions like the Himalayas, where the challenging environmental conditions impede field surveys. This research utilizes the IOE model to refine non-landslide samples and integrates it with multiple machine learning models to conduct a comprehensive assessment of landslide susceptibility in Luolong County, Tibet. The IOE model objectively assigns weights to conditioning factors based on the degree of data dispersion, thereby enhancing the predictive accuracy when combined with machine learning models. This research employed Google Earth satellite imagery to construct a comprehensive database comprising 2517 landslide debris in Luolong County. Twelve conditioning factors were identified, encompassing geological environment, topography, meteorology, hydrology, vegetation, soil, and human activities. The IOE model was integrated with SVC, MLP, LDA, and LR models to systematically evaluate landslide susceptibility in Luolong County. The results demonstrate that, after optimizing the non-landslide samples, the coupled models significantly outperformed the unoptimized models in terms of AUC, accuracy, precision, and F1 score. The ranking of classification performance and effect among the four coupled models is IOE-MLP > IOE-SVC > IOE-LR > IOE-LDA. Notably, the AUC value of the IOE-MLP coupled model increased from 0.8172 to 0.9747. Moreover, in the extremely high susceptibility zones, the IOE-MLP model had the highest landslide frequency ratio among the four coupled models, demonstrating the optimal classification performance and the best classification effect. The study identifies land use, elevation, and slope as the predominant controlling factors conditioning landslides in Luolong County. The regions with the highest susceptibility to landslides in Luolong County are predominantly situated in the central areas near rivers and roads, whereas the areas with the lowest susceptibility are largely located in the southwestern, northern, and certain central regions at elevations above 4500 m, which are consistently shrouded in snow and ice. This comprehensive method effectively resolves the challenge of selecting non-landslide samples, thereby improving the predictive accuracy of the landslide susceptibility model. The results of this study offer significant insights for disaster prevention, mitigation, and land use planning in analogous geological settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Kong Yuzhong & Wu Hua & Xu Chong & Sun Jingjing & Zhu Kangcheng & Zhang Chenguang & Zhou Jianwei & Xu Tong & Su Taijin & Zhang Zelin & Kong Hui, 2025. "Landslide susceptibility mapping using an entropy index-based negative sample selection strategy: A case study of Luolong county," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-27, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322566
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322566
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322566&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0322566?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.