IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0322493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying candidate items for a health-related quality of life measure in young children with respiratory illness: A scoping review of generic and disease-specific measures

Author

Listed:
  • Michaile Gizelle Anthony
  • Graeme Hoddinott
  • Dzunisani Patience Baloyi
  • Anneke Catharina Hesseling
  • Marieke Margreet van der Zalm

Abstract

Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in young children affected by respiratory illnesses remains understudied, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where the burden of these diseases is disproportionately high. Existing HRQoL measures, including both generic and respiratory disease-specific measures, have been reviewed to identify key components that can guide the development of a novel HRQoL tool for young children (0–5-years) with respiratory illnesses. The study aimed to identify candidate items from existing HRQoL measures to inform the development of a new HRQoL tool for young children (0–5 years-old) with respiratory illnesses in a LMIC setting. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, EBSCOhost, and PsycArticles databases Keywords included variations of the following terms ‘quality of life’, ‘health-related quality of life’, ‘wellbeing’, ‘questionnaire’, ‘instrument’, ‘measure’, ‘children’, ‘toddler’, ‘paediatric’, ‘child*’, ‘develop’ or ‘validation’. The search was limited to English-language articles published between January 2000 and November 2023. Deductive thematic analysis was used to organise the measures and synthesise cross-cutting components. Results: Out of 1823 articles, data were extracted from 72 articles reporting on 41 measures. Of these, 20 were generic, and 21 were specific to respiratory diseases. The measures’ key dimensions included physical and emotional health, social support, and school functioning. However, few measures, targeted children 0–5-years, and none incorporated child-specific methods for assessing HRQoL. Existing tools varied widely in their domains and definitions, often lacking consistency and not adequately considering the developmental milestones. Furthermore, most tools were developed in high-income settings (HIC), with limited adaption to the socio-economic burden and disease burden contexts in LMICs. Conclusion: There is an urgent need for a comprehensive HRQoL measure tailored to young children with respiratory illnesses, particularly one designed for use in LMICs. Such a tool should address developmental milestones, cultural sensitivity, and the unique socio-economic challenges faced in these settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Michaile Gizelle Anthony & Graeme Hoddinott & Dzunisani Patience Baloyi & Anneke Catharina Hesseling & Marieke Margreet van der Zalm, 2025. "Identifying candidate items for a health-related quality of life measure in young children with respiratory illness: A scoping review of generic and disease-specific measures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322493
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322493
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322493&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0322493?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.