IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0322397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can kinesio tape negatively affect the treatment by creating a hard floor in plantar fasciitis treatment? A randomized clinical trial

Author

Listed:
  • Tuğba Kocahan
  • Aydan Örsçelik
  • Hüseyin Günaydın
  • Gökhan Büyüklüoğlu
  • Burak Karaaslan
  • Erdoğan Asar
  • Bihter Akınoğlu

Abstract

Background: Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (r-ESWT) is accepted as one of the most effective treatment modalities for plantar fasciitis (PF). Also kinesio taping (KT) applicationis effective for the treatment of PF. However, there is not enough evidence about the effectiveness of the combination of these two modalities in the treatment of PF. This prospective randomized clinical trial was planned to investigate the acute effects of KT application in addition to r-ESWT application on pain, foot function and flexibility. Methods: The study was performed on 42 patients with unilateral PF, that were randomly assigned into two groups receiving four sessions of either r-ESWT or r-ESWT+KT treatment once per week. All patients performed home exercises. Patients’ pain levels were evaluated via the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and foot function via the Foot Function Index (FFI). Flexibility was evaluated through gastro-soleus and plantar fascia flexibility tests. The evaluations were done before and one week after the final treatment. Two Way Analysis of Variance with Repeated Measures and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) methods were used in statistical analyses. Results: As a result, rest pain and activity pain decreased in both groups and there is no differences between the groups (respectively p: 0,831; p: 0.331). FFI pain and disability subscores decreased and were also similar between the groups (respectively p: 0.304; p: 0.978). FFI activity limitation subscore decreased in the r-ESWT group more than r-ESWT+KT group (p: 0.002). Night pain, gastro-soleus and plantar fascia flexibility did not change in both goups (respectively p: 0.713; p: 0.413; p: 0.475). Conclusion: Adding KT to r-ESWT application did not create an additional pain relieving effect, on the contrary, resulted in less improvement in activity limitation. This may be related to the fact that KT application to the sole and heel region creates a hard surface on the heel. r-ESWT application may be more beneficial in PF where activity limitation are prominent. ClinicalTrials.gov: The registration number: NCT06516393

Suggested Citation

  • Tuğba Kocahan & Aydan Örsçelik & Hüseyin Günaydın & Gökhan Büyüklüoğlu & Burak Karaaslan & Erdoğan Asar & Bihter Akınoğlu, 2025. "Can kinesio tape negatively affect the treatment by creating a hard floor in plantar fasciitis treatment? A randomized clinical trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322397
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322397
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322397&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0322397?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.