IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0322333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socioeconomic inequalities related to perceived difficulty in accessing health services among older adults: A cross-sectional analysis of SABE Study Data

Author

Listed:
  • Elaine Cristina Tôrres Oliveira
  • Marília Cristina Prado Louvison
  • Yeda Aparecida de Oliveira Duarte
  • Fabíola Bof de Andrade

Abstract

Analysis of trends and the magnitude of inequalities in access to health services contributes to identifying privileged groups and facilitates discussions on equity policies. Brazil has an important context for studying healthcare access inequalities due to its rapid population aging and the existence of a universal healthcare system guided by equity principles. Therefore, this study aimed to assess socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence of difficulties accessing healthcare services among older adults living in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. This cross-sectional study used data from the Health, Well-being, and Aging Study from three years: 2006 (n = 1,386), 2010 (n = 1,319), and 2015 (n = 1,218). The dependent variable used in this study was difficulty accessing healthcare services, an outcome that aimed to assess, based on the perception of access barriers, any difficulty in using or accessing healthcare services when needed. Independent variables were socioeconomic position measured by years of education (which reflects the number of years of education completed) and monthly income (measured in minimum wages). Absolute (SII) and relative (RII) inequality indices were employed to assess the magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities. The findings indicate that individuals with higher socioeconomic status (measured by education and income) experienced lower frequencies of difficulty in accessing healthcare services. Absolute inequalities based on education and income were significant in 2006 [SII:-0.328 (-0.437; -0.220) and SII:-0.191 (-0.295; -0.087), respectively] and 2015 [SII = -0.198 (-0.314; -0.082) and SII = -0.313 (-0.425; -0.201), respectively]. Relative inequalities were significant across all study years, with difficulties in access being 68.0%, 17.0%, and 42.0% lower among individuals with higher education, and 49.0%, 22.0%, and 58.0% lower among those with higher income in 2006, 2010, and 2015, respectively. This study showed that difficulties to access were more concentrated among individuals with lower socioeconomic status, emphasizing the importance of true universalization of the healthcare system to ensure equitable access.

Suggested Citation

  • Elaine Cristina Tôrres Oliveira & Marília Cristina Prado Louvison & Yeda Aparecida de Oliveira Duarte & Fabíola Bof de Andrade, 2025. "Socioeconomic inequalities related to perceived difficulty in accessing health services among older adults: A cross-sectional analysis of SABE Study Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322333
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322333
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322333&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0322333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.