IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0322299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing ML classification algorithms and NLP techniques for depression detection: An experimental case study

Author

Listed:
  • Giuliano Lorenzoni
  • Cristina Tavares
  • Nathalia Nascimento
  • Paulo Alencar
  • Donald Cowan

Abstract

Context and background. Depression has affected millions of people worldwide and has become one of the most common mental disorders. Early mental disorder detection can reduce costs for public health agencies and prevent other major comorbidities. Additionally, the shortage of specialized personnel is very concerning since depression diagnosis is highly dependent on expert professionals and is time-consuming. Research problems. Recent research has evidenced that machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) tools and techniques have significantly benefited the diagnosis of depression. However, there are still several challenges in the assessment of depression detection approaches in which other conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are present. These challenges include assessing alternatives in terms of data cleaning and pre-processing techniques, feature selection, and appropriate ML classification algorithms. Purpose of the study. This paper tackles such an assessment based on a case study that compares different ML classifiers, specifically in terms of data cleaning and pre-processing, feature selection, parameter setting, and model choices. Methodology. The experimental case study is based on the Distress Analysis Interview Corpus - Wizard-of-Oz (DAIC-WOZ) dataset, which is designed to support the diagnosis of mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, and PTSD. Major findings. Besides the assessment of alternative techniques, we were able to build models with accuracy levels around 84% with Random Forest and XGBoost models, which is significantly higher than the results from the comparable literature which presented the level of accuracy of 72% from the SVM model. Conclusions. More comprehensive assessments of ML classification algorithms and NLP techniques for depression detection can advance the state of the art in terms of improved experimental settings and performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuliano Lorenzoni & Cristina Tavares & Nathalia Nascimento & Paulo Alencar & Donald Cowan, 2025. "Assessing ML classification algorithms and NLP techniques for depression detection: An experimental case study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322299
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322299
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322299&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0322299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.