IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0322139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimized CUT&RUN protocol for activated primary mouse B cells

Author

Listed:
  • Stormy E Ruiz
  • Robert W Maul
  • Patricia J Gearhart

Abstract

ChIP-seq has long been the standard for study of chromatin-protein interactions. However, development of a new technique, CUT&RUN, showed substantial advantages compared to ChIP-seq including higher quality signal while using substantially less sample. While a powerful technique, the original protocol was designed using cell lines and histones as targets. Due to their fragility, this was unsuitable for obtaining high-quality data from activated primary B lymphocytes. To adapt this protocol for B cells, cells were fixed prior to nuclear isolation, and several critical adjustments were introduced to the procedure and reagents. We measured binding of H3K4me3 histone and RNA Polymerase II, detecting robust peaks with as little as 100k nuclei. Additionally, freeze-thaw of B cells prior to processing did not affect results, emphasizing the flexibility of this modified technique. Using the protocol described here will allow one to quantify non-histone proteins bound to DNA from limited numbers of B cells with more efficiency than can be achieved from the current standard, ChIP-seq.

Suggested Citation

  • Stormy E Ruiz & Robert W Maul & Patricia J Gearhart, 2025. "Optimized CUT&RUN protocol for activated primary mouse B cells," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322139
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322139
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322139&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0322139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.