IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0321933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urdu adaptation and validation of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire in a Pakistani population of Achalasia

Author

Listed:
  • Sameen Abbas
  • Syed Sikandar Shah
  • Tayyab Saeed Akhhtar
  • Kiran Hameed
  • Saima Mushtaq
  • Amjad Khan

Abstract

Background: Achalasia, a rare esophageal disease marked by dysphagia, impacts health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), measurable by disease-specific tools like achalasia-specific questionnaire (ASQ) that assess symptom severity and QoL. However, to ensure its reliability and validity across different populations, cross-cultural adaptation is necessary. So, for this reason, this study aimed to validate an Urdu-translated version of an ASQ in a Pakistani population of achalasia patients. Methodology: A prospective cross-sectional study involving 52 participants was conducted at the Center for Liver and Digestive Diseases, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi. ASQ was translated into the Urdu language by a forward-backwards translation process with expert input. Validation included factor analysis, known-group techniques, Cronbach’s alpha for reliability, and an independent t-test comparing ASQ scores with Eckardt scores for criterion validity. Results: Among 52 participants (27 males, median age 30 years; 25 females, median age 48 years), 63.5% had Achalasia type I, 26.9% type II, and 9.6% type III. Factor analysis confirmed a well-defined construct with good validity, and internal consistency was strong (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89). The ASQ scores significantly correlated with Eckardt scores (p

Suggested Citation

  • Sameen Abbas & Syed Sikandar Shah & Tayyab Saeed Akhhtar & Kiran Hameed & Saima Mushtaq & Amjad Khan, 2025. "Urdu adaptation and validation of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire in a Pakistani population of Achalasia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321933
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321933
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321933&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0321933?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.