IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0321870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictors of complications following alloplastic cranioplasty in trauma patients: A multi-center retrospective study

Author

Listed:
  • Jingguo Yang
  • Junjie Wang
  • Chao You
  • Lu Ma
  • Junwen Guan

Abstract

Object: Although technically simple, cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy is associated with high complication rates. Assessing the factors that contribute to these complications is essential. The study aimed to present the complications following alloplastic cranioplasty in trauma patients and evaluate the factors that predispose patients to an increased risk of complications. Methods: The author retrospectively reviewed cranioplasty cases at three institutions following craniectomy for trauma between 01/01/2018 and 31/12/2021. The risk factors included age, sex, smoking history, defect site, defect size, type of alloplastic materials, hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy (DC), hydrocephalus shunts before cranioplasty (CP), and the time interval between initial craniectomy and cranioplasty. The cranioplasty complications assessed were postoperative new-onset seizures, reoperation for hematoma, implant failure, and postoperative subgaleal effusion. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess these risk factors. Results: A total of 191 cranioplasties were included in this study, with a major complication rate of 26.2% (50 of 191). In multivariate analysis, the risk factors for major complications were smoking history, titanium cranioplasty, and a time interval to cranioplasty exceeding 3 months. Predictors of new-onset seizures in multivariate analysis included younger age, smoking history (OR = 4.69, p

Suggested Citation

  • Jingguo Yang & Junjie Wang & Chao You & Lu Ma & Junwen Guan, 2025. "Predictors of complications following alloplastic cranioplasty in trauma patients: A multi-center retrospective study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321870
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321870
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321870&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0321870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.