IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0321771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy and safety of Tuina (Chinese Therapeutic Massage) for chronic ankle instability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author

Listed:
  • Liguo Liu
  • Junqun Huang
  • Tao Li
  • Mingwang Qiu
  • Yanling Huang
  • Zhiyong Fan
  • Shan Wu
  • Yanbin Huang

Abstract

Objective: The efficacy of tuina in treating chronic ankle instability (CAI) arouses controversy. Therefore, the present study adopted the meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tuina in treating CAI and aims to provide high-quality evidence for this promising treatment. Methods: We searched eight databases from inception to April 1st, 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of tuina treatment for CAI, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, and VIP Chinese Science and Technique Journals database. Information was independently extracted and bias risks were evaluated by two researchers. To assess the quality of the studies, we utilized Cochrane Collaboration’s tool and the GRADE evaluation system. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan5.4 software. Results: Thirteen RCTs involving 984 patients were included in this study. The overall methodological quality of the studies was low. The meta-analysis revealed the followings: (1) the clinical effective rate was higher in the treatment group compared to the control group (OR = 6.51, 95% CI [3.76, 11.28]); (2) the treatment group performed better in reducing the Visual Analogue Scale score (MD = −1.59, 95% CI [−2.59, −0.59]); (3) the Baird-Jackson Ankle Score was superior in the treatment group (MD = 8.20, 95% CI [6.37, 10.04]); (4) the improvement in the AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Scale was greater in the treatment group (MD = 14.52, 95% CI [9.81, 19.23]). All differences were statistically significant. Regarding adverse events, there were no significant differences in incidence rates between the groups. Conclusions: Tuina is an effective and safe treatment option for CAI, the conclusions are limited by the methodological quality of the included trials. Further high-quality research is needed to confirm these findings and guide clinical practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Liguo Liu & Junqun Huang & Tao Li & Mingwang Qiu & Yanling Huang & Zhiyong Fan & Shan Wu & Yanbin Huang, 2025. "Efficacy and safety of Tuina (Chinese Therapeutic Massage) for chronic ankle instability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321771
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321771
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321771&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0321771?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.