IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0321561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk prediction models for non-suicidal self-injurious behavior in patient with depressive disorder: a protocol for systematic review and mata-analyisis

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Huang
  • Xiao Liu
  • Jiao Xu
  • Ling Wang
  • Qiran Zhang

Abstract

Introduction: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) frequently occurs in patients with depressive disorder and often presents as burning or severe scratching. NSSI plays a crucial role in increasing the risk of self-injury in individuals with depressive disorder. Despite the progressive development of various risk prediction models to identify NSSI, there are significant differences in their overall predictive performance. This systematic review aims to evaluate the quality and applicability of these models in predicting NSSI among patients with depressive disorders. Methods and analysis: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted targeting patients with depressive disorder. We included studies on risk prediction models for NSSI behavior in this population that were developed and published. The primary outcome was NSSI behavior as reported by the prediction models. Predictive variables were measured at different disease stages in patients with depressive disorder, with no specific limitations on the prediction horizon. The intended use of the risk prediction model is to individualize the prediction of NSSI behavior of in patients with depressive disorder, thus facilitating the implementation of preventive measures to avoid adverse events. Databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Database, PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, and Embase, were searched from inception to March 2024 by two independently reviewers. Data extraction followed the guidelines outlined in the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS). The risk of bias and applicability of the included studies were assessed using PROBAST. Descriptive statistical methods were employed to summarize the characteristics of the NSSI models and meta-analysis for model validation was conducted using Stata software. Conclusion: The study will systematically review the prediction models for NSSI in patients with depressive disorders to enhance clinical practice. This research will also assist clinicians in selecting effective prediction models for NSSI in this patient population.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Huang & Xiao Liu & Jiao Xu & Ling Wang & Qiran Zhang, 2025. "Risk prediction models for non-suicidal self-injurious behavior in patient with depressive disorder: a protocol for systematic review and mata-analyisis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-7, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321561
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321561
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321561&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0321561?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.