IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0321535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence of sickle cell anemia in Africa: A protocol for a meta-analysis of existing studies

Author

Listed:
  • Bwambale Jonani
  • Emmanuel Charles Kasule
  • Herman Roman Bwire
  • Otema Ricky
  • Joel Fredrick Arturo
  • Matsiko Livingstone
  • Nassinde Esther
  • Namirembe Esther
  • Namale Joanitah
  • Lillian Nabbanja Naava
  • Ssebulime Stephen
  • John Bosco Mundaka

Abstract

Background: Sickle cell anemia (SCA) rank 11th among all causes of mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa, with the region accounting for 75% of global cases. Inconsistent diagnostic methods and country-specific data gaps hinder current prevalence estimates. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to provide pooled prevalence estimates and examine geographic and temporal trends in SCA. Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to determine the pooled prevalence of SCA across Africa and analyze its geographic and temporal distribution patterns by synthesizing data from existing studies. Methods: We will search four major databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, BASE, and Scopus, for studies on SCA prevalence in Africa published between 1994 and 2024. We will use Zotero to remove duplicates and screen titles and abstracts. We will assess the methodological quality with the JBI critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data and extract data using a tested MS Excel form from studies with low to moderate bias. We will use random-effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled prevalence estimates and conduct subgroup analyses for heterogeneity. We will evaluate publication bias with funnel plots and Egger’s test, using trim-and-fill analysis if asymmetry is detected. The strength of evidence will be assessed using the AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews). Expected Results: We expect to find significant variations in SCA prevalence across different regions and age groups, reflecting underlying environmental, diagnostic and methodological factors. We aim to identify any shifts in SCA prevalence and distribution patterns, which could inform future public health strategies and interventions Discussion: Our analysis will reveal the pooled prevalence of SCA in Africa, influencing diagnostic, environmental, and methodological factors, guiding targeted public health interventions. Registration: Our meta-analysis protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) on 8th January, 2025. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/M8JXV

Suggested Citation

  • Bwambale Jonani & Emmanuel Charles Kasule & Herman Roman Bwire & Otema Ricky & Joel Fredrick Arturo & Matsiko Livingstone & Nassinde Esther & Namirembe Esther & Namale Joanitah & Lillian Nabbanja Naav, 2025. "Prevalence of sickle cell anemia in Africa: A protocol for a meta-analysis of existing studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-8, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321535
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321535
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321535&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0321535?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.