IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0321459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural labor migration and household waste separation willingness: Evidence from 6849 rural residents in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Yu
  • Dan Pan

Abstract

Understanding the key determinants of rural household waste separation willingness (HWSW) is indispensable in promoting sustainable development for many developing economies. Few studies have been dedicated to examining the impact of large-scale rural labor migration (RLM) on HWSW in rural China. Based on a nationwide sample including 6849 rural residents, this paper investigates the relationship between RLM and rural residents’ HWSW. The generalized propensity score (GPS) method and the instrumental variable (IV) approach are used to account for potential selection bias and endogenous problems. The results show that RLM inhibits rural residents' HWSW. Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the negative impact of RLM on HWSW is larger for rural residents who live in Midwest China, with low education and less income. Further mechanism analysis shows that RLM reduces rural residents’ HWSW by decreasing their social capital, undermining their rural community administration, and diminishing their village's collective economic income.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Yu & Dan Pan, 2025. "Rural labor migration and household waste separation willingness: Evidence from 6849 rural residents in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321459
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321459
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321459&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0321459?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.