IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0321452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking Differential Abundance Tests for 16S microbiome sequencing data using simulated data based on experimental templates

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Kohnert
  • Clemens Kreutz

Abstract

Differential abundance (DA) analysis of metagenomic microbiome data is essential for understanding microbial community dynamics across various environments and hosts. Identifying microorganisms that differ significantly in abundance between conditions (e.g., health vs. disease) is crucial for insights into environmental adaptations, disease development, and host health. However, the statistical interpretation of microbiome data is challenged by inherent sparsity and compositional nature, necessitating tailored DA methods. This benchmarking study aims to simulate synthetic 16S microbiome data using metaSPARSim (Patuzzi I, Baruzzo G, Losasso C, Ricci A, Di Camillo B. MetaSPARSim: a 16S rRNA gene sequencing count data simulator. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019;20:416. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-2882-6 PMID: 31757204) MIDASim (He M, Zhao N, Satten GA. MIDASim: a fast and simple simulator for realistic microbiome data. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.23.533996), and sparseDOSSA2 (Ma S, Ren B, Mallick H, Moon YS, Schwager E, Maharjan S, et al. A statistical model for describing and simulating microbial community profiles. PLOS Comput Biol. 2021;17(9):e1008913. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008913 PMID: 34516542) , leveraging 38 real-world experimental templates (S3 Table) previously utilized in a benchmark study comparing DA tools. These datasets, drawn from diverse environments such as human gut, soil, and marine habitats, serve as the foundation for our simulation efforts. We employ the same 14 DA tests that were previously used with the same experimental data in benchmark studies alongside 8 DA tests that were developed subsequently. Initially, we will generate synthetic data closely mirroring the experimental datasets, incorporating a known truth to cover a broad range of real-world data characteristics. This approach allows us to assess the ability of DA methods to recover known true differential abundances. We will further simulate datasets by altering sparsity, effect size, and sample size, thus creating a comprehensive collection for applying the 22 DA tests. The outcomes, focusing on sensitivities and specificities, will provide insights into the performance of DA tests and their dependencies on sparsity, effect size, and sample size. Additionally, we will calculate data characteristics (S1 and S2 Table) for each simulated dataset and use a multiple regression to identify informative data characteristics influencing test performance. Our prior study, where we used simulated data without incorporating a known truth, demonstrated the feasibility of using synthetic data to validate experimental findings. This current study aims to enhance our understanding by systematically evaluating the impact of known truth incorporation on DA test performance, thereby providing further information for the selection and application of DA methods in microbiome research.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Kohnert & Clemens Kreutz, 2025. "Benchmarking Differential Abundance Tests for 16S microbiome sequencing data using simulated data based on experimental templates," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321452
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321452
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321452&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0321452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.