IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0321423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medication adherence scales in non-communicable diseases: A scoping review of design gaps, constructs and validation processes

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Jose
  • Priyanka Rajmohan
  • T S Sulfath
  • Ravi Prasad Varma
  • Manoj Mohan
  • Nisha K Jose
  • Jerin Jose Cherian
  • Mohan Lal Bairwa
  • Tulika Goswamy
  • Aditi Apte
  • Praveenlal Kuttichira
  • Joe Thomas

Abstract

Introduction: NCDs arise from complex interactions of modifiable factors such as unhealthy lifestyles, poor diet, and psychosocial challenges, along with non-modifiable factors like age and genetics. Notably, medication non-adherence is a widespread and growing concern, significantly contributing to disease progression and poor outcomes globally. Objective: This scoping review aims to synthesize evidence on medication adherence scales used for selected non communicable diseases. It examines their development methods, psychometric properties, and assessed domains, while identifying gaps or limitations in their design and application. Materials and methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework guided this scoping review and the protocol was registered prospectively to ensure methodological transparency and rigor. Electronic databases, the reference list of included articles, and grey literature were searched. Studies published in English from January 1950 to June 2024 were included. Two reviewers independently screened all articles, and a third reviewer settled any conflicts between the reviewers. Critical appraisal of the screened-in articles was done using JBI critical appraisal scales. The data was compiled into tables and a narrative summary that is consistent with the review’s goal. Results: Our study included 140 articles, identifying 57 medication adherence scales. These scales, developed using qualitative methods (10.8%), literature review (32.4%), and mixed methods (45.9%), primarily focus on behavior, often neglecting cost-related non-adherence, self-efficacy, and systemic barriers. Psychometric findings varied widely, reflecting heterogeneity in study designs and scale development approaches. Many scales lack validation in diverse settings, underscoring the need for comprehensive, context-sensitive tools. Conclusion: This scoping review highlights gaps in existing medication adherence scales for NCDs, particularly their limited consideration of socioeconomic and cultural factors and incomplete adherence assessment. Future research should focus on developing more holistic, contextually relevant adherence scales that integrate these dimensions. Strengthening adherence measurement methodologies can enhance patient-centered care, inform policy interventions, and improve health outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Jose & Priyanka Rajmohan & T S Sulfath & Ravi Prasad Varma & Manoj Mohan & Nisha K Jose & Jerin Jose Cherian & Mohan Lal Bairwa & Tulika Goswamy & Aditi Apte & Praveenlal Kuttichira & Joe Thomas, 2025. "Medication adherence scales in non-communicable diseases: A scoping review of design gaps, constructs and validation processes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-44, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321423
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321423
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321423&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0321423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.