Author
Listed:
- Alan Reubenson
- Leo Ng
- Vidya Lawton
- Irmina Nahon
- Rebecca Terry
- Claire Baldwin
- Julia Blackford
- Alex Bond
- Rosemary Corrigan
- Megan Dalton
- Amabile Borges Dario
- Michael Donovan
- Ruth Dunwoodie
- Genevieve M Dwyer
- Roma Forbes
- Alison Francis-Cracknell
- Janelle Gill
- Andrea Hams
- Anne Jones
- Taryn Jones
- Belinda Judd
- Ewan Kennedy
- Prue Morgan
- Tanya Palmer
- Casey Peiris
- Carolyn Taylor
- Debra Virtue
- Cherie Zischke
- Daniel F Gucciardi
- on behalf of the Physiotherapy Clinical Education Research Collaborative (PCERC)
Abstract
The Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (APP) is a 20-item assessment instrument used to assess entry-level physiotherapy practice in Australia, New Zealand and other international locations. Initial APP reliability and validity evidence supported a unidimensional or single latent factor as the best representation of entry-level physiotherapy practice performance. However, there remains inconsistency in how the APP is interpreted and operationalised across Australian and New Zealand universities offering entry-level physiotherapy programs. In essence, the presumption that the psychometric integrity of the APP generalises across people, time, and contexts remains largely untested. This multi-site, archival replication study utilised APP assessment data from 8,979 clinical placement assessments, across 19 Australian and New Zealand universities, graduating entry-level physiotherapy students (n=1865) in 2019. Structural representation of APP scores were examined via confirmatory factor analysis and penalised structural equation models. Factor analyses indicated a 2-factor representation, with four items (1–4) for the professional dimension and 16 items (5–20) for the clinical dimension, is the best approximation of entry-level physiotherapy performance. Measurement invariance analyses supported the robustness of this 2-factor representation over time and across diverse practice areas in both penultimate and final years of study. The findings provide strong evidence for the psychometric integrity of the APP, and the 2-factor alternative interpretation and operationalisation is recommended. To meet entry-level standards students should be assessed as competent across both professional and clinical dimensions of physiotherapy practice.
Suggested Citation
Alan Reubenson & Leo Ng & Vidya Lawton & Irmina Nahon & Rebecca Terry & Claire Baldwin & Julia Blackford & Alex Bond & Rosemary Corrigan & Megan Dalton & Amabile Borges Dario & Michael Donovan & Ruth , 2025.
"The assessment of physiotherapy practice is a robust measure of entry-level physiotherapy standards: Reliability and validity evidence from a large, representative sample,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-18, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0321397
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321397
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.