IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0321211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preparing medical students to incorporate scientific evidence into patient care: A cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Susanna M Wallerstedt
  • Martin Garwicz
  • Pontus Henriksson
  • Karin Mossberg
  • Estelle Naumburg
  • Jeanette Wahlberg
  • Riitta Möller

Abstract

Objective: To explore teaching- and assessment-related factors that predict medical students’ perceived attainment of sufficient skills to incorporate scientific evidence into patient care. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to final-semester students in six medical programs in Sweden. The students were asked to rate statements concerning the extent to which 11 national degree outcomes related to the scientific basis of medicine (scholarly degree outcomes) had been adequately assessed during the program; their perceived preparedness for evidence-based patient care; and training during the program regarding the components of a systematic review/health technology assessment (HTA). Results: In total, 433 students (median age: 25 years [interquartile range: 24‒28], 59% female) participated in the study (response rate: 68%). A multivariate analysis indicated that experienced adequate assessment on a single scholarly degree outcome (i.e., “Demonstrate knowledge of the scientific foundation of medicine and insight into current research as well as knowledge of the link between science and proven experience”) predicted the students’ perception of having developed sufficient skills in incorporating scientific evidence into patient care (odds ratio: 6.17 [95% confidence interval: 3.10; 12.3]). The educational content predictors of this perception included the teaching of HTA (11.3 [1.44; 89.5]) and training regarding two components of a systematic review/HTA: appraising scientific articles using checklists (2.46 [1.23; 4.90]) and assessing organizational aspects related to the introduction/withdrawal of a health technology (2.65 [1.05; 6.67]). The presence of hands-on, credit-bearing, evidence-based medicine (EBM)-related learning activities during clinical courses was also predictive (4.68 [1.69; 13.0]). Conclusions: This study highlights important educational activities that prepare medical students to incorporate scientific evidence into patient care: (i) adequate assessment of key content regarding scholarly outcomes, including the scientific foundation of medicine; (ii) learning activities about HTA and the systematic review process; and (iii) hands-on application of EBM-related learning activities integrated into clinical courses.

Suggested Citation

  • Susanna M Wallerstedt & Martin Garwicz & Pontus Henriksson & Karin Mossberg & Estelle Naumburg & Jeanette Wahlberg & Riitta Möller, 2025. "Preparing medical students to incorporate scientific evidence into patient care: A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321211
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321211
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321211&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0321211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.