Author
Listed:
- Helen Miliotis
- Nana Hyung-Ran Lee
- Rachael Cayley
- Christina Zakala
- Allan Kaplan
- Reinhart Reithmeier
Abstract
Although the career pathways of biomedical PhDs are increasingly diverse, graduate education continues to rely upon an apprenticeship model, whereby supervisors train the next generation of researchers. To broaden the core competency skills for research productivity and career development across the Temerty Faculty of Medicine’s departments and institutes, a for-credit curricular Graduate Professional Development (GPD) course has been implemented as an integral part of the graduate curriculum in multiple departments. We used three key principles to advance this integrated professional development curriculum: i) a train-the-trainers method for implementation, ii) direct student engagement via a students-as-partners model, one-on-one consultations and videos, and iii) a faculty development program. While programming of this sort has direct benefits, less is known about how students themselves experience curricular GPD. To address the gap in understanding the impact, research was undertaken to inquire about students’ perceived skills development and attitudes towards career choices after taking the GPD course. According to our findings, students see the curricular GPD course as a valuable complement to their graduate education and feel more prepared for their next steps in their career exploration. With buy-in from students, faculty and academic leaders, embedded curricular GPD has transformed the academic culture of graduate education in our faculty, helping our students with skills that empower them to be prepared for their own career development to meet the competitive career realities of our time.
Suggested Citation
Helen Miliotis & Nana Hyung-Ran Lee & Rachael Cayley & Christina Zakala & Allan Kaplan & Reinhart Reithmeier, 2025.
"Embedding professional development within the curriculum of graduate programs: An impact survey from biomedical departments in a faculty of medicine,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-13, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0321207
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321207
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0321207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.