IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0320876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring mobility patterns and social health of older Canadians living at home to inform decision aids about housing: A mixed-methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Diogo Mochcovitch
  • Allyson Jones
  • Joshua Goutte
  • Karine V Plourde
  • Roberta de Carvalho Corôa
  • Marie Elf
  • Louise Meijering
  • Jodi Sturge
  • Pierre Bérubé
  • Stéphane Roche
  • Sabrina Guay-Bélanger
  • France Légaré

Abstract

Introduction: Many tools support housing decisions for older adults but often overlook mobility patterns and social health. We explored these factors in older Canadians living at home to inform housing decisions. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study with 20 older adults (65+) from Quebec and Alberta living independently or in senior residences with outdoor mobility. Data collection included sociodemographic information, GPS tracking, walking interviews, daily journals, and in-depth interviews. Data from interviews, which explored physical and social assets and barriers to social health and mobility, were analyzed using deductive content analysis in NVivo 12. GPS data were subjected to spatial analysis in QGIS (Quantum Geographic Information System) to map activity spaces and mobility patterns by the number and distance of activities, activity types, and modes of transportation. Daily journals were transcribed into an Excel spreadsheet and compared with GPS data. Overall analysis was guided hierarchically by qualitative data, utilizing verbatim narratives and visualization (activity space maps) to illustrate data convergence. Results: Among 20 participants, 14 completed all activities, including GPS trackers. GPS maps showed participants mostly left home to drive for shopping or walking. Over 14 days, participants made an average of 10.4 (±5.8) trips and traveled 186.9 km (±130.4), averaging 16.8 km (±29.8) per day. Transportation modes included car (n=9), walking (n=5), and bus (n=2). Daily journals revealed that participants typically traveled alone. Interviews identified physical assets as libraries and supermarkets (n=10), while social assets were family support when desired (n=13) neighborhood familiarity (n=14), both contributing to social health. Winter weather was the most cited mobility barrier (n=13). Conclusions: These findings provide actionable insights to guide the development of user-informed decision support tools tailored to the housing decisions of Canadian older adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Diogo Mochcovitch & Allyson Jones & Joshua Goutte & Karine V Plourde & Roberta de Carvalho Corôa & Marie Elf & Louise Meijering & Jodi Sturge & Pierre Bérubé & Stéphane Roche & Sabrina Guay-Bélanger &, 2025. "Exploring mobility patterns and social health of older Canadians living at home to inform decision aids about housing: A mixed-methods study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320876
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0320876
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0320876&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0320876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.