IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0320635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moderate to severe chronic arteriolar lesions is an independent risk factor for adverse renal outcomes in IgA nephropathy

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Wu
  • Yi Chen
  • Miaoying Shen
  • Yuyuan Cai
  • Haokai Yu
  • Lei Zhou
  • Haifeng Yang
  • Chuan Zou

Abstract

Background: The impact of chronic arteriolar lesions on the prognosis of IgA nephropathy remains controversial. This study aims to explore the value of chronic arteriolar lesions of varying degrees in predicting the prognosis of IgA nephropathy patients and analyze the associated risk factors that contribute to the formation. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 853 patients diagnosed with IgA nephropathy through renal biopsy at Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between September 1, 2005, and December 31, 2021. Eventually, a total of 574 cases were included in this study. According to the degree of chronic arteriolar lesions, the patients were divided into four groups: no lesion group (n=115), mild lesion group (n=287), moderate lesion group (n=131), and severe lesion group (n=41). Relevant clinical and pathological features and renal outcomes were recorded. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were utilized to examine the relationship between different degrees of chronic arteriolar lesions and the prognosis of IgA nephropathy. Additionally, risk factors associated with the development of moderate to severe chronic arteriolar lesions were identified. Results: Worse clinical and pathological features were observed in the moderate to severe lesions group (P

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Wu & Yi Chen & Miaoying Shen & Yuyuan Cai & Haokai Yu & Lei Zhou & Haifeng Yang & Chuan Zou, 2025. "Moderate to severe chronic arteriolar lesions is an independent risk factor for adverse renal outcomes in IgA nephropathy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320635
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0320635
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0320635&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0320635?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.