IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0320530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-directed learning in health professions: A mixed-methods systematic review of the literature

Author

Listed:
  • Joana Berger-Estilita
  • Linda Krista
  • Artemisa Gogollari
  • Felix Schmitz
  • Achim Elfering
  • Sissel Guttormsen

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the application and effectiveness of various self-directed learning (SDL) models in healthcare organizations. This study aims to identify the prevalent SDL models and factors influencing SDL adoption in healthcare settings. Methods: A systematic review was conducted, encompassing a comprehensive search across multiple academic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, and the Cochrane Library). The final search was conducted on April 16, 2024. The inclusion criteria were studies involving health and allied health professionals in clinical settings that explored SDL in any context or form of activity, emphasizing the description and/or use of an SDL model or SDL-related concept. Both qualitative and quantitative studies were included. We also explored the factors facilitating or hindering SDL and specific SDL-related outcomes, accommodating various study designs. Results: The final review synthesized findings from 34 articles involving over 5,700 healthcare professionals (including nurses, pharmacists, and physicians). The findings reveal that supportive organizational cultures significantly enhance SDL practices, whereas restrictive policies hinder their effectiveness. Various SDL models were identified and examined, showing that integrative frameworks combining individual motivation with structured organizational support yielded the best outcomes in fostering lifelong learning and adaptability among healthcare professionals. These findings emphasize the significance of individual motivation, learning environment, technological resources, social interactions, and SDL readiness among healthcare professionals. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that SDL is crucial for the continuous professional development of healthcare providers and should be strategically supported by healthcare organizations. This study contributes to a better understanding of the interplay between SDL, workplace dynamics, and digital technology in healthcare practices. Identifying prevalent SDL models and factors influencing their adoption offers valuable insights for healthcare professionals on effective implementation strategies that address both its barriers and facilitators. Systematic review registration: reviewregistry1309, February 28, 2022 (www.researchregistry.com).

Suggested Citation

  • Joana Berger-Estilita & Linda Krista & Artemisa Gogollari & Felix Schmitz & Achim Elfering & Sissel Guttormsen, 2025. "Self-directed learning in health professions: A mixed-methods systematic review of the literature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320530
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0320530
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0320530&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0320530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.