IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0320248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labour and social protection gaps impacting the health and well-being of workers in non-standard employment: An international comparative study

Author

Listed:
  • Signild Kvart
  • Isabel Cuervo
  • Virginia Gunn
  • Wayne Lewchuk
  • Kim Bosmans
  • Letitia Davis
  • Astrid Escrig-Piñol
  • Per-Olof Östergren
  • Eva Padrosa
  • Alejandra Vives
  • Alessandro Zaupa
  • Emily Q Ahonen
  • Valentina Álvarez-López
  • Mireia Bolíbar
  • Ignacio Diaz
  • Mariana Gutiérrez-Zamora
  • Lars Ivarsson
  • Mireia Julià
  • Carles Muntaner
  • Patricia O’Campo
  • Marisol E Ruiz
  • Kristian Vänerhagen
  • Emilia F Vignola
  • David Vílchez
  • Mattias Vos
  • Theo Bodin
  • Sherry L Baron

Abstract

Background: World economies increasingly rely on non-standard employment arrangements, which has been linked to ill health. While work and employment conditions are recognized structural determinants of health and health equity, policies aiming to protect workers from negative implications predominantly focus on standard employment arrangements and the needs of workers in non-standard employment may be neglected. The aim of this study is to explore workers’ experiences of gaps in labour regulations and social protections and its influence on their health and well-being across 6 countries with differing policy approaches: Belgium, Canada, Chile, Spain, Sweden, and the United States. Methods: 250 semi-structured interviews with workers in non-standard employment were analyzed thematically using a multiple case-study approach. Results: There are notable differences in workers’ rights to protection across the countries. However, participants across all countries experienced similar challenges including employment instability, income inadequacy and limited rights and protection, due to policy-related gaps and access-barriers. In response, they resorted to individual resources and strategies, struggled to envision supportive policies, and expressed low expectations of changes by employers and policymakers. Conclusions: Policy gaps threaten workers’ health and well-being across all study countries, irrespective of the levels of labour market regulations and social protections. Workers in non-standard employment disproportionately endure economic risks, which may increase social and health inequality. The study highlights the need to improve social protection for this vulnerable population.

Suggested Citation

  • Signild Kvart & Isabel Cuervo & Virginia Gunn & Wayne Lewchuk & Kim Bosmans & Letitia Davis & Astrid Escrig-Piñol & Per-Olof Östergren & Eva Padrosa & Alejandra Vives & Alessandro Zaupa & Emily Q Ahon, 2025. "Labour and social protection gaps impacting the health and well-being of workers in non-standard employment: An international comparative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320248
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0320248
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0320248&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0320248?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.